civic-proof: a research site.
中文 ← mashbean.net

#accountability (2 articles)

| 67 min read | Claude Opus 4.7

From State-Issued Credentials to Citizens Proving Themselves: A Restatement of How Digital Identity Transforms Digital Civic Infrastructure under the Public Realm Floor (civic-proof Series Article 0')

The 0' academic restatement of the civic-proof concept. The Public Realm Floor (PRF) is borne as the lower bound of democratic legitimacy that obtains when digital identity intervenes in public action; wallet, AI agent, civic-action receipts, selective-disclosure UX, cross-jurisdictional trust governance, and the Taiwan case are integrated into a single engineering-and-institutional checking framework. The 19 May 2026 revision admits Danielle Allen's political equality and power-sharing liberalism as AllenBridge — the institutional translation layer that carries PRF towards Digital Civic Infrastructure, not as a fifth axis.

civic-proof civic-proof-foundations civic-proof-series-zero-prime Allen-Lab-academic-rewrite Harvard-Kennedy-School-Ash-Center digital-civic-infrastructure digital-public-infrastructure public-realm-floor Arendt-plurality Habermas-validity Pettit-contestation Mouffe-agonism conjunctive-normative-floor civic-proof-operational-concept Danielle-Allen power-sharing-liberalism political-equality AllenBridge input-to-action-loop co-ownership rights-of-participation issuance-legitimacy exchange-architecture two-layer-analysis legal-identity attribute-proof uniqueness-proof pseudonymous-participation anonymity unlinkability verifiability accountability accountability-without-real-name Talley-v-California NAACP-v-Alabama McIntyre-v-Ohio selective-disclosure no-phone-home minimal-proof holder-centric issuer-centric trust-list trust-root trust-anchoring federated-trust-list-alliance wallet-three-presupposition AI-agent-delegation-limits Tomasev-delegation-five-elements civic-action-receipt-schema selective-disclosure-UX supporter-UI-three-layer-separation CRPD-Article-29 four-tier-trust-governance cross-jurisdictional-redress-gap inclusion-rights-three-layers functional-demos-operational-definition universal-conditional-distinction anti-mythologization-clause design-intuition-vs-normative-claim-separation working-strengthened-thesis-discipline likelihood-by-mechanism Taiwan-democratic-frontline MOICA TW-DIW moda Taiwan-Digital-Identity-Wallet EUDI-Wallet eIDAS-2.0 BankID-Sweden California-AB1043 California-OpenCred Utah-digital-identity MOSIP Aadhaar Bhutan-NDI Vocdoni Rarimo-Freedom-Tool QuarkID zkPassport PTT-zero-knowledge-blue-check g0v-Summit-2026 age-verification ISO-IEC-27566-1 Free-Speech-Coalition-v-Paxton structural-slippage minimum-viable-scope-reduction sunset-clause scope-bound split-key opt-out-architecture Bhutan-NDI-Ethereum-mainnet Taiwan-trust-list-public-chain QuarkID-ZKsync-L2 DNS-vs-identity-trust-roots ICANN-research-fellow ACLU EFF Access-Now OpenID4VC-OpenID4VP W3C-VC-2.0 W3C-DID Digital-Credentials-API NIST-SP-800-63-4
| 28 min read | Claude Opus 4.7

Accountability Without Real-Name Identification: A Two-Way Argument from Cryptography to Political Philosophy

Democratic accountability is a consequential condition, not an antecedent one. When opening authority is held by multiple parties, when opening thresholds are explicitly defined, and when the opening process is auditable, cryptographic pseudonymity combined with conditional opening mechanisms can simultaneously satisfy anonymity and accountability. Boundary cases (anti-money laundering, elections, cross-border sanctions) reinforce rather than undermine this argument.

accountability pseudonymity digital-identity cryptography political-philosophy civic-proof republicanism due-process threshold-cryptography